Defining Development

It was clear to tell from this weeks readings that land means everything to the people of Guatemala. In America, being able to own your own home is a staple of success and pride. In Guatemala however, land is livelihood. Land is treated as something to be honored and cared for, almost like a pet or elderly family member. I found it endearing how much pride is taken in farming their land. However, I found myself questioning what development really means, once again. Although it is much accepted now and typical for the farmers to stop growing maize and beans to farm for profitable "cash crops" such as cauliflower and broccoli, which are currently in high demand in the states, I am not sure the change of crops counts as development. I understand the thought process behind growing crops that produce a high retail value and are in more demand, but when I think of economic development I think of a higher level of development, with more increased currency flow.

One point that I felt overwhelming clear this week in the Pan-Mayan Movement article was the endless cycle of oppression that can be sensed in Guatemala's history. I believe a large reason for this problem is the endless yearning for labels of identity and acceptance. No one in Guatemala seems to have a clear understanding of who they are and who they represent. Mayans, Spanish, Second and Third generation Guatemalans, they all just seem lost, and as if they are still searching for who they are as a people. I think that if everyone felt a pride in their country, rather then the pain of the past it would be a lot easier to effect change and find a common goal of what is best for the people.